故事發(fā)生在1973年的格拉斯哥,對(duì)于男孩詹姆斯(威廉·艾迪 William Eadie 飾)來(lái)說(shuō),這個(gè)夏天并不好過(guò),炎炎的烈日讓人怎么都打不起精神,而清潔工人的大罷工讓街道瞬間變成了堆滿(mǎn)了腐臭垃圾的垃圾場(chǎng)。當(dāng)然,這些都不是最重要的,最讓詹姆斯寢食難安的是自己的朋友賴(lài)安(Thomas McTaggart 飾)的死亡,是他的死和自己有著千絲萬(wàn)縷的聯(lián)系。
透過(guò)詹姆斯的眼睛,我們看到了骯臟不堪的世界,但同時(shí),他茫然躊躇的目光里依然飽含著對(duì)未來(lái)的憧憬和對(duì)愛(ài)的渴望。在誰(shuí)也不知道的地方,一顆幼小的靈魂不斷的被痛苦糾纏著,磨礪著,作為代價(jià),它將綻放出最最讓人驚詫的純凈光芒。
A history context analysis on the British Realism Film Ratcatcher
Ratcatcher is the first feature-length film by British female director Lynn Ramsay. Since being released in 1999, it has won lots of awards at various film festivals, because of not only the delicacy of its shooting but also its profound reflection on British society in the 1970s.
This contemporary film’s realistic focus on the working class inherits the spirit of social realism in the British New Wave in the 1950s and 1960s. At that time, on the one hand, the British economy was devastated by the war, the middle class was weakened and the working class appealed to a fair and stable social environment (Winson, 2013, p. 22). On the other hand, the success of the Soviet Union has raised people’s doubts about the capitalist system. Hence, the image of the “angry young men” began to appear in literature and film, usually showing the discontent of the working class with class society (Luo, 2019, p. 24). The films of this period are known as British New Wave and social realism, or working-class realism from the content, poetic realism from style.
Furthermore, the Labor party, which represented the interest of the working class, began to dominate in parliament, and strongly promoted nationalization and welfare policies. However, after some degree of economic recovery, the defects of the welfare system unveiled gradually and led to stagflation (Winson, 2013, pp. 5-6). Until 1975, Margaret Thatcher of the Conservative party came to power and advocated neoliberalism, cutting welfare spending, and encouraging market competition (Scott-Samuel et al, 2014, p. 54). The British economy was boosted but also brought a widening of the class division and the decline in the living quality of the working class. Therefore, in the 1980s, British social realism was revived and lots of films focusing on the working class appeared again (Shafer, 2001, p. 9). The story of Ratcatcher happens in 1973 and reflects the life of the working class at the end of the welfare society, many of the details in the film are closely related to the social background at that time.
Rats is perhaps a metaphor for laborers. The welfare system provides enough living security and seriously discourages the laborers’ enthusiasm for work. The traditional virtue of labor is replaced by the lazy pleasure of consumerism (Zhang & Lin, 2018, p. 40). In the film, James’ father is a representative of the working class, sleeps all day instead of working, indulges in TV, beer, and football. His only wish is for the committee to allocate a new house.
Moreover, any attempt to reduce welfare will cause public discontent, like this cleaning workers’ strike. The garbage in the streets and the television news reports all hint at this situation.
Under this circumstance, tax revenue falls but welfare spending stays high. The government is in a passive position and the national economy is in a downturn. The working class does not create social value but lives in the burrow of the welfare system like the rat. The strike in the film leads to a chaotic community where rats live with people, implying they are homogenous, dirty, poor, and living at the bottom. The ratcatcher is referring to the coming Thatcher reforms, to the abolition of the welfare state and the elimination of the welfare-dependent working class. At the end of the film, the army, representing the government, is deployed to clean up rats and rubbish, while residents shout abuse upstairs.
As a female director, Ramsay pays deep attention to gender identity. The identity of the male is lost at that time. When livelihoods depend on welfare, the role of men as the source of income is weakened. By contrast, when the center of life moves from society, the public sphere, to family, the private sphere, consumerism overwhelms the culture of the working-class, the status of the female is promoted (Zhang & Lin, 2018, p. 40). Therefore, for the male, on the one hand, they feel a sense of marginalization in this loss of identity, so they try to acquire a sense of self-satisfaction through a kind of arbitrary, which includes contempt for the female and arrogance towards their juniors, such as James’ father slaps his wife when drunk or the teenagers humiliate Margaret and tease James and Kenny.
On the other hand, soccer, as a sport that relies on unity and physical strength, becomes the last symbol of working-class culture, and the spiritual sustenance of the male. In the film, boys play soccer in the street, James’ father persistently gives James a pair of soccer shoes as a gift, and even the teenagers throw Kenny’s mouse back and forth like soccer.
In the Ratcatcher, children may be more like “angry young men”. The story is narrated from the perspective of James, a child. Compared with the frustration of adults, children’s psychological activities are more complicated. Vitality is a child’s nature, which is suppressed by a negative social atmosphere. The desire of young men to break through the social hierarchy by working hard is limited by a lazy welfare system, like carrying the death of a friend.
Water is perhaps a metaphor for the welfare system. Water can either support life or deprive it. The bathtub full of water brings James happiness, but the endless sewage in the canal drowns his friend like an overdose of welfare, which is gently but fatal, so neither James nor his friend struggles in the canal.
Therefore, children are the only ones having hopes for the future, because the future is an escape from reality, which is the origin of the poetic element. The suburban house for James and the moon for Kenny, are all the places with poetic background music, and without water.
Furthermore, under this repression, children are eager to grow up and have a voice, so they imitate the elders. James tried to join the teenagers and control his sisters. Whereas, when the suburban house is locked and Margaret is still humiliated by the teenagers, James realizes his helplessness and gives up and suicides in the canal. But for Kenny, after being rescued from the canal, he joins the camp of ratcatcher.
Ratcatcher is a calm and slow film. What Ramsay expresses is not simple criticism of Thatcherism or sympathy on the working-class, but the two-sidedness of policies and their great impact on the public. After two decades of Thatcher's policies, it is worth wondering what Britain is and about to face.
Word Count: 1080
(excluding 84 words on remarks of figures)
l Reference List (APA)
Calderwood, A. (Producer). Ramsay, L. (Screenwriter/ Director). (1999). Ratcatcher [Motion Picture]. Britain: British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).
Luo, X. (2019). 論英國(guó)新浪潮電影的“廚房水槽”現(xiàn)實(shí)主義美學(xué)特征 [the Realistic Aesthetic Characteristics of "Kitchen Sink" in British New Wave Films]. Journal of Guizhou University (Art Edition), 33(2), 22-26. doi: 10.15958/j.cnki.gdxbysb.2019.02.004
Scott-Samuel, A., Bambra, C., Collins, C., Hunter, D. J., McCartney, G., & Smith, K. (2014). The impact of Thatcherism on health and well-being in Britain. International Journal of Health Services, 44(1), 53-71. Retrieved from JSTOR Journals. Retrieved from //www.jstor.org/stable/45140692
Shafer, S. C. (2001). An overview of the working class in British feature film from the 1960s to the 1980s: from class consciousness to marginalization. International Labor and Working-Class History. (59), 3-14. Retrieved from JSTOR Journals. Retrieved from //www.jstor.org/stable/27672706
Winson, A. (2013). Social realism of British New Wava “Left” films: The working-class border character. (Master’s Thesis) Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
Zhang, J., & Lin X. (2018). 20世紀(jì)八九十年代英國(guó)工人階級(jí)電影特征 [The characteristics of working class in British working class films in the 1980s and 1990s]. Movie Literature, (10), 39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0495-5692.2018.10.013
這是一部非常耐看的電影,我也是看了三四遍才逐漸發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的魅力。這部電影非常赤裸地展示了琳恩曾經(jīng)作為攝影師的扎實(shí)功底,大部分的場(chǎng)景都將運(yùn)動(dòng)的畫(huà)面呈現(xiàn)出類(lèi)似靜止的狀態(tài),這就巧妙地通過(guò)對(duì)時(shí)間的攫取來(lái)使某個(gè)瞬間得以延長(zhǎng),這種近乎靜止的時(shí)刻就非常容易讓人們把握事物的存在,哪怕是暫時(shí)的。比如影片的最后James的笑容仿佛被定格在麥田中央,讓人們能夠抓住那一刻James“愿望實(shí)現(xiàn)”的幸福感。同時(shí)這種類(lèi)似攝影的拍攝手法還能改變影片的敘事速率,從而帶來(lái)一種創(chuàng)傷性重復(fù)的狀況,那些近乎靜止的場(chǎng)景就是在反映影片敘事中創(chuàng)傷反復(fù)中的暫時(shí)中斷感。簡(jiǎn)單來(lái)說(shuō),James作為一個(gè)孩子,在瑞恩死了以后會(huì)一直處在負(fù)罪感之中,而這些幾乎靜止的畫(huà)面就好比一個(gè)休息站、庇護(hù)所,讓他能喘口氣或是感受其他美好的情感,我覺(jué)得這種以拍攝手法的不同來(lái)切換敘事速率,從而給觀(guān)眾帶來(lái)不同情感體驗(yàn)的方式真的非常巧妙。比如34:20這里James趴在Margaret-Ann身上的俯拍鏡頭,畫(huà)面和人物都近乎靜止,但總能感受到畫(huà)面中散發(fā)的不摻雜質(zhì)的單純的幸福感,這大概就是James所渴望的庇護(hù)所吧,平靜而舒心;42:23這個(gè)James站在麥田中央的中景鏡頭,滿(mǎn)屏的暖色調(diào)溢出James來(lái)到夢(mèng)幻之地的放松與舒心…這些不僅是James的休息站,也能讓觀(guān)眾從壓抑的情緒中得以喘息。雖然畫(huà)面給人以靜止的感覺(jué),但里面的情感確實(shí)交織涌動(dòng),讓人扎身于其中,隨其波動(dòng)。
#BFI# #BigsScreenClassics# 現(xiàn)實(shí)主義作品,帶有肯洛奇的風(fēng)格,與《小孩與鷹》一樣,以英國(guó)底層小孩的眼睛看這個(gè)全英范圍內(nèi)的大罷工,再看這個(gè)社會(huì)。
本片在開(kāi)場(chǎng)就展現(xiàn)給觀(guān)眾了一場(chǎng)慘劇,讓觀(guān)眾與小男主一樣參與到了這次意外中,弱肉強(qiáng)食的社會(huì)中,誰(shuí)有確定自己是那捕鼠人,而不是只老鼠,片中老鼠似乎就象征著小男主自己,垃圾在城市之中堆積,大量的工程停擺,老鼠在大量繁殖,那條承載了大量悲傷的河又一次送葬了一條生命,與開(kāi)始呼應(yīng)。
視覺(jué)上,構(gòu)圖和運(yùn)鏡非常棒,尤其是構(gòu)圖,畫(huà)面分割,大量的前景遮擋,都讓同樣知道秘密的觀(guān)眾從視覺(jué)上體會(huì)到那種空間被大量壓縮的窒息感。特寫(xiě)升格很大程度的放大了情緒。
聽(tīng)覺(jué)上,很多時(shí)候配樂(lè)還是偏歡快的,帶有“青春成長(zhǎng)”的節(jié)奏感,當(dāng)然對(duì)于悲劇的烘托使用的耳鳴也很不錯(cuò),讓觀(guān)眾把注意力都集中在畫(huà)面上。
不太喜歡超現(xiàn)實(shí)表達(dá)的部分,無(wú)論是小白鼠的升空和結(jié)尾處的處理,逃避現(xiàn)實(shí)的殘酷再以超現(xiàn)實(shí)展現(xiàn)的笑容始終不如現(xiàn)實(shí)來(lái)的更有沖擊力。
以寫(xiě)實(shí)的手法刻畫(huà): 孤獨(dú)、壓抑、敏感的少年內(nèi)心世界, 成長(zhǎng)的自我。 更何況還有恐懼和內(nèi)疚, 只好將好像永遠(yuǎn)消耗不完的精力發(fā)泄在荒誕與暴力。 他們既是捕鼠者,也是被捕的鼠。 有著自己的生活,自己的個(gè)性,自己的境遇的父輩們, 他們也有他們的程度,也有他們的難處, 成長(zhǎng)的家庭。 骯臟的社區(qū),混亂的街道,昏庸的政治, 成長(zhǎng)的環(huán)境。 … 但是, 少年的內(nèi)心深處其實(shí)是溫暖和柔軟的, 他們渴望被尊重和了解, 不只是吃飽喝足,更需要精神與心靈的關(guān)懷,與愛(ài)。 父輩們雖可以理解,但也可以做的更多。 … 那窗明幾凈,那藍(lán)天白云,那金色稻田, 和那少年的笑容, 是最美好的期許!
不錯(cuò)
鏡頭暗下去的時(shí)候我心一直揪著,喊著快起來(lái)啊。。。還好結(jié)尾看到了麥田中他的笑臉,一切美好的像什么也沒(méi)發(fā)生過(guò)一樣。大人們總是不能理解孩子,怎么忽然就發(fā)脾氣了,怎么忽然就哭了,其實(shí)他們只是不肯試著去了解。絕對(duì)的五星。對(duì)于這種悶片,開(kāi)始看的時(shí)候真是很痛苦,看完之后,也真的很爽。
鬼魅的詩(shī)意與嚴(yán)酷的現(xiàn)實(shí)在拉姆塞的[捕鼠者]里產(chǎn)生了奇妙的化學(xué)反應(yīng)。前者在她極善于捕捉細(xì)節(jié)的鏡頭里迸發(fā),而后者則毫無(wú)征兆地再度降臨,猶如突然打向絞在窗簾里小男生的一巴掌。死水的形象在電影里有著舉足輕重的地位,凝滯骯臟好像死亡的宮殿;但同時(shí)又蘊(yùn)含著巨大的流動(dòng)潛能,這就是直覺(jué)里詩(shī)的樣子。
我或許也應(yīng)該在這20幾年的某段時(shí)間里讓自己能有理由的離開(kāi)這個(gè)世界
這簡(jiǎn)直是我看過(guò)的最好的英國(guó)青春片了。那特寫(xiě),太銷(xiāo)魂了。音樂(lè)的口味也棒。開(kāi)放式結(jié)尾
這種英式青春片的灰色暗調(diào)調(diào)是從哪里開(kāi)始發(fā)源的呢,包括自我苑囿自我厭棄自我憐憫的小形式主義小象征主義都很相似,這片又多了幾個(gè)夢(mèng)幻的場(chǎng)景鏡頭,算是感人之處。最后結(jié)尾處雜草場(chǎng)的用光好亮,一家人都來(lái)這個(gè)夢(mèng)幻地了,小男孩的笑也是幻想,都沉在水底了
孤獨(dú),陰冷,寂寞,隔閡,貧窮,無(wú)處訴說(shuō),不被理解,憂(yōu)傷,死亡,性。童年。此類(lèi)英國(guó)電影永遠(yuǎn)是我的軟肋。
越往后越強(qiáng)...
清冷蕭索
說(shuō)不出來(lái)的棒
無(wú)助與失落在成長(zhǎng)中交相輝映。Goodbye, Snowball!
理解倫敦騷亂的社會(huì)原因
垃圾堆積如山形成的破敗環(huán)境,老鼠和跳蚤,不良少年與糟糕的生存環(huán)境。用這些外部環(huán)境展示主角內(nèi)心,同時(shí)再以美好的夢(mèng)境(麥田)作為對(duì)比??催@片總有點(diǎn)提心吊膽的,總覺(jué)得下一秒會(huì)發(fā)生什么恐怖的事情。
夢(mèng)想中金燦燦的生活,和惡臭腐壞的現(xiàn)實(shí)之間的距離,可能比死與生之間的距離大得多。被結(jié)尾沉沉擊中。電影中陰雨不絕的格拉斯哥,垃圾遍地、老鼠四竄的居住環(huán)境,讓偶爾的幾個(gè)想象鏡頭顯得尤其寶貴,并且那幾個(gè)鏡頭也透著一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)導(dǎo)演女性視角的溫柔吧
孤獨(dú)是什么,是一覺(jué)醒來(lái)只有漆黑又寂靜的房間陪著你。走出去,臟亂街上也沒(méi)有人,只有那一陣一陣的涼風(fēng)。但是,不要怕,走下去,總會(huì)找到喧鬧而又亮堂的街市。
如此殘酷孤獨(dú)灰暗的童年,真讓人心臟受不了~
很好看~
原來(lái)真的有很多老鼠…悶片不推薦
在泥沼中打滾,如野草般瘋長(zhǎng)。日常片段與意象強(qiáng)化,讓此種頹喪而無(wú)望的氣氛滲入人心。與安德里亞阿諾德如同天平的兩端,一個(gè)似暖陽(yáng),一個(gè)如寒月。
last film in SFF. Tilda is so charming!she said she will attend Lynne's next film which is really expecting! really love this director anyway.(有一些細(xì)節(jié)和特質(zhì)是可供辨認(rèn)的。如同你的小說(shuō)。)